4.8 Article

Reductive precipitation of sulfate and soluble Fe(III) by Desulfovibrio vulgaris: Electron donor regulates intracellular electron flow and nano-FeS crystallization

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 91-101

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.044

Keywords

D. vulgaris; SO42- reduction; Soluble Fe-III reduction; Iron-sulfide; Crystallization

Funding

  1. Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-09ER64803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fully understanding the metabolism of SRB provides fundamental guidelines for allowing the microorganisms to provide more beneficial services in water treatment and resource recovery. The electron transfer pathway of sulfate respiration by Desulfovibrio vulgaris is well studied, but still partly unresolved. Here we provide deeper insight by comprehensively monitoring metabolite changes during D. vulgaris metabolism with two electron donors, lactate and pyruvate, in presence or absence of citrate-chelated soluble Fe-III as an additional competing electron acceptor. H-2 was produced from lactate oxidation to pyruvate, but pyruvate oxidation produced mostly formate. Accumulation of lactate originated H-2 during lag phases inhibited pyruvate transformation to acetate. Sulfate reduction was initiated by lactate-originated H-2, but MQ-mediated e(-) flow initiated sulfate reduction without delay when pyruvate was the donor. When H-2-induced electron flow gave priority to Fe-III reduction over sulfate reduction, the long lag phase before sulfate reduction shortened the time for iron-sulfide crystallite growth and led to smaller mackinawite (Fe1+xS) nanocrystallites. Synthesizing all the results, we propose that electron flow from lactate or pyruvate towards Sai-reduction to H2S are through at least three routes that are regulated by the e(-) donor (lactate or pyruvate) and the presence or absence of another e- acceptor (Fell) here). These routes are not competing, but complementary: e.g., H-2 or formate production and oxidation were necessary for sulfite and disulfide/trisulfide reduction to sulfide. Our study suggests that the e(-) donor provides a practical tool to regulate and optimize SRB-predominant bioremediation systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available