4.8 Article

Fouling behavior of lysozyme on different membrane surfaces during the MD operation: An especial interest in the interaction energy evaluation

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 33-46

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.041

Keywords

Membrane distillation; Membrane surface properties; XDLVO theory; Surface reconstruction; Interaction energy; LYS deposition pattern

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51508153]
  2. Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu [BK20150813]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The membrane fouling behaviors of lysozyme (LYS) on three different membranes were systematically investigated during the membrane distillation (MD) process, including polypropylene (PP), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The results showed that PP membrane was not suitable for the MD operation due to its lower heat resistance. A flux decline of 50% was observed for the PTFE, while PVDF displayed a more severe decrement of 70%. Additionally, the PTFE and PVDF membranes both demonstrated a faster flux decline during the early period, and then a clear decrement of fouling rate was obtained at the later period. To better understand the interactions between LYS and different membranes, the interaction energy between LYS and the reconstructed membrane surface, represented by XDLVO potential, was calculated by surface element integration. The PVDF membrane exhibited higher roughness and lower energy barrier, indicating that rougher membrane was tended to be fouled by LYS. Finally, a four stages model was suggested for the MD fouling process, which was associated with three LYS deposition patterns of smooth, protuberance and valley. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available