4.6 Article

Integrating guanxi into technology acceptance: An empirical investigation of WeChat

Journal

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 1125-1142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.003

Keywords

Guanxi; Ganging; Mianzi; Renging; Technology acceptance; Social media

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [4F709]
  3. Hebei University's special fund for promoting universities in Midwest China
  4. Hebei University's government administration and public policy research center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social influence is an important research topic in the technology acceptance literature, in particular for social media. Prior empirical studies have for the most part employed social influence theory to investigate user intentions to continue with social media, while culture driven theories have been neglected. Rather than using social influence theory, we introduced guanxi theory to explore how guanxi social mechanisms (or processes) influence Chinese users' continuance intentions in WeChat. Specifically, we developed a model that examines the role of guanxi as manifested by renging, mianzi and ganging in perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment and continuance intention in WeChat. A survey research method was adopted to test the proposed hypotheses. This study found that ganging has a positive impact on perceived usefulness and continuance intention. Mianzi exerts a negative effect on continuance intention but exhibits a positive effect on perceived usefulness. Renging was found to have no significant impact on perceived usefulness and continuance intention. Our study advances the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by introducing guanxi-based constructs in a Chinese mobile social-messaging application context. Our study also offers alternative insights on guanxi-based social influence processes in the Chinese technology acceptance literature. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available