4.6 Article

Nature beyond Linearity: Meteorological Variability and Jensen's Inequality Can Explain Mast Seeding Behavior

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00134

Keywords

masting; plants; reproduction; seed production; weather; variability; linearity

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2013-726 SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  2. Spanish Government [CGL2016-79835-P]
  3. Catalan Government [SGR 2014-274]
  4. NOVFORESTS of the Spanish Ministry of Economy [CGL2012-33398]
  5. FORASSEMBLY of the Spanish Ministry of Economy [CGL2015-70558-P]
  6. project BEEMED of the Catalan Government [SGR913]
  7. University of Antwerp
  8. (Polish) National Science Foundation [Preludium 2015/17/N/NZ8/01565]
  9. Foundation for Polish Science Scholarship Start

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mast seeding, the extremely variable and synchronized production of fruits, is a common reproductive behavior in plants. Weather is centrally involved in driving masting. Yet, it is often claimed that it cannot be the sole proximate cause of masting because weather is less variable than fruit production and because the shape of their distributions differ. We used computer simulations to demonstrate that the assumption that weather cannot be the main driver of masting was only valid for linear relationships between weather and fruit production. Non-linear relationships between interannual variability in weather and crop size, however, can account for the differences in their variability and the shape of their distributions because of Jensen's inequality. Exponential relationships with weather can increase the variability of fruit production, and sigmoidal relationships can produce bimodal distributions. These results challenge the idea that meteorological variability cannot be the main proximate driver of mast seeding, returning meteorological variability to the forefront of masting research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available