4.5 Article

Exploring the impact of megaproject environmental responsibility on organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: A social identity perspective

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1402-1414

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.008

Keywords

Megaproject; Environmental responsibility; Organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment; Environmental commitment; Social identity theory

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571137, 71471136, 71390523]
  2. International Exchange Program for Graduate Students of Tongji University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment (OCBEs) has been clearly established in the environmental literature. However, the OCBEs construct has rarely been examined in the specific and increasingly important realm of megaproject environmental responsibility (MER). To fill this gap, this paper presents an individual-level analysis that explores the impact of project participants' perceptions of MER practices on their environmental commitment and OCBEs. The results show that project participants' perceptions of MER practices directed toward internal stakeholders (i.e., stakeholders linked by project contracts) are positively related to their OCBEs. This relationship is partially mediated by the environmental commitment of project participants. Conversely, project participants' perceptions of MER practices directed toward external stakeholders (i.e., the local community and general public) have only an insignificant impact on their OCBEs. These findings provide new insights for managing MER practices to stimulate the emergence of OCBEs and thereby improve environmental performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available