4.7 Article

The policy effects of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's waste incineration power industry

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 711-723

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.009

Keywords

Feed-in tariff; Renewable portfolio standard; Waste incineration power industry; Policy effects; System dynamics

Funding

  1. Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation [16JDYJB031]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273088]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XS107, 2017XS112]
  4. Energy Service Company Energy design and research institute of State Grid Corporation [SGJNSJ00SCTS1600079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the regulatory policies, feed-in tariffs (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are the most popular to promote the development of renewable energy power industry. They can significantly contribute to the expansion of domestic industrial activities in terms of sustainable energy. This paper uses system dynamics (SD) to establish models of long-term development of China's waste incineration power industry under FIT and RPS schemes, and provides a case study by using scenario analysis method. The model, on the one hand, not only clearly shows the complex logical relationship between the factors but also assesses policy effects of the two policy tools in the development of the industry. On the other hand, it provides a reference for scholars to study similar problems in different countries, thereby facilitating an understanding of waste incineration power's long-term sustainable development pattern under FIT and RPS schemes, and helping to provide references for policy-making institutions. The results show that in the perfect competitive market, the implementation of RPS can promote long-term and rapid development of China's waste incineration power industry given the constraints and actions of the mechanisms of RPS quota proportion, the TGC valid period, and fines, compared with FIT. At the end of the paper, policy implications are offered as references for the government. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available