4.7 Article

Feasibility study on the application of coal gangue as landfill liner material

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 161-171

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.016

Keywords

Coal gangue; Landfill liner; Hydraulic conductivity; Sorption characteristics; Leaching behavior

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51579132, 51609123, 51323014]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [THZ-02-2]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M581104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coal gangue is one of the largest industrial solid waste all over the world, and many methods have been proposed for the recycling of coal gangue. In the present study, the feasibility of using coal gangue as landfill liner material is studied through a series of laboratory tests in terms of hydraulic conductivity, sorption characteristics and leaching behavior. The results indicated that the hydraulic conductivity of coal gangue could be smaller than the regulatory requirement 1 x 10(-7) cm/s with a void ratio less than 0.60. The batch sorption experiments performed on Pb2+ and Zn2+ illustrated that the coal gangue showed remarkable sorption capacity for the two heavy metals, and the sorption capacity for Pb2+ was larger than that for Zn2+. Both the pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order models fitted well with the sorption kinetics data of the Pb2+ and Zn2+ on the coal gangue, and the Langmuir model was found to best-fit the sorption isotherms. The sorption capacity decreased in presence of multiple heavy metals, both for Pb2+ and Zn2+ .Concentrations of heavy metals leached from the coal gangue were all below the regulatory limits from China MEP and U.S. EPA. These desirable characteristics indicated that the coal gangue has potential to be used as landfill liner materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available