4.8 Article

Optimizing Adhesive Design by Understanding Compliance

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 50, Pages 27771-27781

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b08934

Keywords

adhesives; gecko-inspired adhesion; bioinspiration; adhesive optimization; scaling

Funding

  1. Human Frontiers Science Program
  2. University of Massachusetts CVIP Technology Development Fund
  3. NSF MRSEC (NSF) [DMR-2820506]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adhesives have long been designed around a trade-off between adhesive strength and releasability. Geckos are of interest because they are the largest organisms which are able to climb utilizing adhesive toepads, yet can controllably release from surfaces and perform this action over and over again. Attempting to replicate the hierarchical, nanoscopic features which cover their toepads has been the primary focus of the adhesives field until recently. A new approach based on a scaling relation which states that reversible adhesive force capacity scales with (A/C)(1/2), where A is the area of contact and C is the compliance of the adhesive, has enabled the creation of high strength, reversible adhesives without requiring high aspect ratio, fibrillar features. Here we introduce an equation to calculate the compliance of adhesives, and utilize this equation to predict the shear adhesive force capacity of the adhesive based on the material components and geometric properties. Using this equation, we have investigated important geometric parameters which control force capacity and have shown that by controlling adhesive shape, adhesive force capacity can be increased by over 50% without varying pad size. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that compliance of the adhesive far from the interface still influences shear adhesive force capacity. Utilizing this equation will allow for the production of adhesives which are optimized for specific applications in commercial and industrial settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available