3.8 Review

Systematic Review of the Topical Steroid Addiction and Topical Steroid Withdrawal Phenomenon in Children Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis and Treated With Topical Corticosteroids

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE DERMATOLOGY NURSES ASSOCIATION
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 233-240

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JDN.0000000000000331

Keywords

Adverse Effects; Children; Eczema; Red Skin Syndrome; Topical Steroid Addiction; Topical Steroid Withdrawal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A 2015 National Eczema Association study concluded that topical steroid withdrawal is an effect of prolonged, frequent use of topical steroids occurring mostly in adult women. It is unclear whether children develop topical steroid withdrawal. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess current evidence regarding topical steroid withdrawal in children. Methods: This study is a systematic review of medical literature as well as online social media sites and blogs regarding topical steroid withdrawal in children. Results: Literature search yielded zero studies on/or reporting classic topical steroid withdrawal in children; however, periorificial dermatitis, which is generally a steroid-induced disorder in children, was reported in 9320 cases. Of 142 social media blogs on topical steroid withdrawal, 26 were blogs discussing children. Twenty-seven cases were included in this review. Length of topical steroid use ranged from 2 months to 12 years. Conclusions: Topical steroid withdrawal occurs in children and can result from discontinuing topical steroids used for as little as 2 months. Resultant signs/symptoms can last 912 months, even with short duration of use. Clinicians and caregivers should be aware of this possible adverse effect of topical steroids and monitor the effects of topical steroids on infants/children, but more data are needed on this condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available