4.7 Article

Why mundane energy use matters: Energy biographies, attachment and identity

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 71-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.016

Keywords

Energy transitions; Energy justice; Energy ethics; Social practices; Attachment; Narrative; Biography

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council grant [RES-628-25-0028]
  2. EPSRC Grant [EP/M008053/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/M008053/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. ESRC [ES/I007067/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M008053/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, debates about energy justice have become increasingly prominent. However, the question of what is at stake in claims about energy justice or injustice is a complex one. Signifying more than simply the fair distribution of quantities of energy, energy justice also implies issues of procedural justice (participation) and recognition (acknowledgement of diverse values constitutive of ways of life). It is argued that this requires an acknowledgement of why energy use matters in everyday life. Data from the Energy Biographies project at Cardiff University is used to explore connections between the relational texture of everyday life and the ethical significance of energy. In particular, it is demonstrated that embodiment, attachment and narrative are features of sense-making that contribute significantly to everyday understandings of the ethical meanings of different ways of using energy. Using multimodal and biographical qualitative social science allows these implicit forms of evaluation to become more tangible, along with the relationships between them. Conceiving of energy consumers as subjects with biographies, with attachments, and as engaged bodily in energy consumption can open up, it is suggested, different ways of enacting the procedural and recognition aspects of energy justice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available