4.7 Article

Economic efficiency of willow, poplar and black locust production using different soil amendments

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 74-82

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.019

Keywords

Salix viminalis; Populus nigra x P. maximowiczii; Robinia pseudoacacia; Production cost; Income; Revenue

Funding

  1. strategic program of the National (Polish) Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR) [SP/E/4/65786/10]
  2. Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production statutory sources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Profitability of biomass production is the main condition to be fulfilled for farmers to be more interested in growing short rotation woody crops (SRWC). The aim of this study was to assess the cost and economic efficiency of production of chips from three SRWC species (willow, poplar, black locust) depending on the soil amendment method, biomass prices and the transportation distance to the end user. The economic analysis assessed the cost of dry chips and unit energy production, revenue, discounted pay-back period, net present value and internal rate of return. In the base scenario the highest revenue 292 (sic) ha(-1) year(-1) was found for willow amended with lignin. The best revenue for poplar (194 (sic) ha(-1) year(-1)) was achieved when the crop was fertilised with mineral fertiliser and amended with lignin. No options for black locust were profitable. Other economic indices were the best in the production of willow as well. The change in the biomass price and transport distance influenced the revenue in the production of all species. Our study has indicated the importance of the right choice of species and method of soil amendment, as this determined the biomass yield and it had a great effect on the cost of chip production and the amount of revenue gained from such production. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available