4.4 Article

Induction of cell death by tospoviral protein NSs and the motif critical for cell death does not control RNA silencing suppression activity

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 508, Issue -, Pages 108-117

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.05.003

Keywords

Reaper; Trp/GH3 motif; Vacuolar processing enzyme; MicroRNA

Categories

Funding

  1. ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  2. University Grant Commission, New Delhi
  3. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi
  4. Rural Development Administration from the Republic of Korea [PJ011309032017]
  5. Korean National Research Foundation from the Republic of Korea [NRF-2016R1D1A1B03930764]
  6. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ011309032017] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Groundnut bud necrosis virus induces necrotic symptoms in different hosts. Previous studies showed reactive oxygen species-mediated programmed cell death (PCD) resulted in necrotic symptoms. Transgenic expression of viral protein NSs mimics viral symptoms. Here, we showed a role for NSs in influencing oxidative burst in the cell, by analyzing H2O2 accumulation, activities of antioxidant enzymes and expression levels of vacuolar processing enzymes, H2O2-responsive microRNA 319a.2 plus its possible target metacaspase-8. The role of NSs in PCD, was shown using two NSs mutants: one in the Trp/GH3 motif (a homologue of pro-apototic domain) (NSs(s189R)) and the other in a non-Trp/GH3 motif (NSs(L172R)). Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) expressing NSs(S189R) enhanced the PCD response, but not TRV-NSs(L172R), while RNA silencing suppression activity was lost in TRV-NSs(L172R), but not in TRV-NSs(S189R). Therefore, we propose dual roles of NSs in RNA silencing suppression and induction of cell death, controlled by different motifs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available