Journal
VETERINARY RECORD
Volume 181, Issue 19, Pages 510-+Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1136/vr.104304
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) [OD0558]
- Pat Impson Memorial Fund
- Langford Trust via Pat Impson Residency in Bovine Health Management
- ESRC [ES/P008194/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- NERC [NE/N01961X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/P008194/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N01961X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Food-producing animals throughout the world are likely to be exposed to antimicrobial (AM) treatment. The crossover in AM use between human and veterinary medicine raises concerns that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may spread from food-producing animals to humans, driving the need for further understanding of how AMs are used in livestock practice as well as stakeholder beliefs relating to their use. A rapid evidence assessment (REA) was used to collate research on AM use published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2016. Forty-eight papers were identified and reviewed. The summary of findings highlights a number of issues regarding current knowledge of the use of AMs in food-producing animals and explores the attitudes of interested parties regarding the reduction of AM use in livestock. Variation between and within countries, production types and individual farms demonstrates the complexity of the challenge involved in monitoring and regulating AM use in animal agriculture. Many factors that could influence the prevalence of AMR in livestock are of concern across all sections of the livestock industry. This REA highlights the potential role of farmers and veterinarians and of other advisors, public pressure and legislation to influence change in the use of AMs in livestock.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available