4.6 Article

Nephrotic Syndrome With Cancer Immunotherapies: A Report of 2 Cases

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 581-585

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.04.026

Keywords

Oncologic immunotherapies; pembrolizumab; acute kidney injury (AKI); ipilimumab; nephrotic syndrome; nephrotic-range proteinuria; podocytopathy; minimal change disease; case reports

Funding

  1. University of Toronto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oncologic immunotherapies use a patient's immune response to eliminate tumor cells by modulation of immune checkpoints, including programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) proteins. Immune-mediated sequelae, including interstitial nephritis, have been reported; however, glomerular disease appears rare. We describe 2 cases of nephrotic syndrome in patients treated with these agents. Patient 1 received the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab for Hodgkin lymphoma. Following his second dose, he developed nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney injury. Biopsy showed diffuse foot-process effacement consistent with minimal change disease and findings of acute tubular injury. Pembrolizumab therapy cessation and corticosteroid treatment yielded improvement in proteinuria and acute kidney injury. Patient 2 received the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab for melanoma. He developed nephrotic syndrome with biopsy changes consistent with minimal change disease. Ipilimumab therapy was stopped and proteinuria resolved following corticosteroid treatment. Ipilimumab rechallenge caused relapse of nephrotic-range proteinuria. These cases suggest an association between therapeutic immune activation and the development of nephrotic syndrome. Given the increasing prevalence of oncologic immunotherapies, monitoring patients for renal sequelae is warranted. (C) 2017 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available