4.7 Article

Lattice QCD exploration of parton pseudo-distribution functions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094503

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-04ER41302, DE-FG02-97ER41028]
  3. National Science Foundation (USA) [PHY-1516509]
  4. National Science Foundation (MRI) [PHY-1626177]
  5. Commonwealth of Virginia Equipment Trust
  6. Office of Naval Research
  7. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1516509] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Physics [1626177] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate a new method of extracting parton distributions from lattice calculations. The starting idea is to treat the generic equal-time matrix element M(Pz(3), z(3)(2)) as a function of the Ioffe time nu = Pz(3) and the distance z(3). The next step is to divide M(Pz(3), z(3)(2)) by the rest-frame density M(0, z(3)(2)). Our lattice calculation shows a linear exponential z(3)-dependence in the rest-frame function, expected from the Z(z(3)(2)) factor generated by the gauge link. Still, we observe that the ratio M (Pz(3), z(3)(2))/M(Pz(3), z(3)(2)) has a Gaussian-type behavior with respect to z(3) for 6 values of P used in the calculation. This means that Z (z(3)(2))factor was canceled in the ratio. When plotted as a function of nu and z(3), the data are very close to z(3)-independent functions. This phenomenon corresponds to factorization of the x-and k(perpendicular to)-dependence for the TMD F(x, k(perpendicular to)(2)) . For small z(3) <= 4a, the residual z(3)-dependence is explained by perturbative evolution, with alpha(s)/pi = 0.1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available