4.8 Article

Effect of Dimensionality and Doping in Quasi-One-Dimensional (1-D) Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Nanoribbons on the Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 44, Pages 38409-38418

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09601

Keywords

N-doped graphene nanoribbons (N-GNRs); oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); electrocatalytic active sites; quasi-one-dimensional; zigzag edges

Funding

  1. IUSSTF [22-2012/2013-14]
  2. CSIR
  3. [CSC-0101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Designing an efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is a challenging research theme having enormous practical importance in several renewable energy technologies like fuel cell and metal-air batteries. Here we discuss a cost-effective and commercially viable strategy to develop high-performance nitrogen-doped graphene nanoribbon (NGNR), which is a quasi-one-dimensional analogue of graphene. We have selected the N-GNR system to identify the doping-induced variation in the distribution of active catalytic sites experimentally in graphene-based electrocatalysts. N-GNR exhibits a comparable exchange current density (1.65 x 10(-9) vs 2.25 x 10(-9) A cm(-2)), thermodynamic potential (0.80 vs 0.83 V), and smaller Tafel slope (55 vs 60 mV dec(-1)) with respect to the benchmarking platinum/carbon (Pt/C), and also, more precisely, it goes through a four-electron pathway with low hydrogen peroxide yield. Although the exact mechanism is still not clear, the theme of the work is based on the identification of the possible active sites with the help of experimental evidence like X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. These results support the assumption that an edge N (pyridinic N)-bonded adjacent C lowers the activation energy barriers of O-2 adsorption, predominantly to kinetically facilitate the ORR. activity. We hope these results will be helpful in developing more efficient ORR catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available