4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the volume stability of magnesium phosphate cement with different types of mineral admixtures

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 10-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.037

Keywords

Magnesium phosphate cement; Volume stability; Mineral admixtures; Mechanism; ESEM

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678442, 51478348, 51508404]
  2. National High-speed Train Union Fund [U1534207]
  3. Key project of the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [15DZ1205003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) composited by dead burned magnesia (Mgo) and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4, KDP) is a type of excellent repairing material, and its volume stability has great influence on its applications. This paper studied the effects of different types of mineral admixtures on the volume stability of MPC mortar by testing its volume deformation at different curing ages. The main mechanisms to explain how the mineral admixtures affect the volume stability were studied by XRD and ESEM analyses. The experimental results indicate that the influence of ultra -fine fly ash on the volume deformation is different from that of fly ash and silica fume. The volume expansion increases as the content of fly ash in mortar increases while the volume expansion decreases as the content of ultra-fine fly ash increases. For MPC-fly ash system, the use of ultra -fine fly ash can decrease the volume expansion significantly. Moreover, the addition of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate also has significant influence on the volume stability of MPC mortar. The XRD analysis indicates that the amount of sylvite in MPC mortar is the reason for the changes in the volume stability after adding mineral admixtures. The ESEM imaging confirms that the use of ultra-fine fly ash can decrease the quantity of micro cracks in the MPC mortar. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available