4.6 Article

Ex vivo construction of human primary 3D-networked osteocytes

Journal

BONE
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 245-252

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.09.012

Keywords

Human bone tissue model; Human primary osteocytes; Human primary osteoblasts; 3D culture; Microfluidic; Sclerostin; SOST; FGF23

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [1R21AR065032]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR 1409779]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1409779] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A human bone tissue model was developed by constructing ex vivo the 3D network of osteocytes via the biomimetic assembly of primary human osteoblastic cells with 20-25 mu m microbeads and subsequent microfluidic perfusion culture. The biomimetic assembly: (1) enabled 3D-constructed cells to form cellular network via processes with an average cell-to-cell distance of 20-25 pm, and (2) inhibited cell proliferation within the interstitial confine between the microbeads while the confined cells produced extracellular matrix (ECM) to form a mechanically integrated structure. The mature osteocytic expressions of SOST and FGF23 genes became significantly higher, especially for SOST by 250 folds during 3D culture. The results validate that the bone tissue model: (1) consists of 3D cellular network of primary human osteocytes, (2) mitigates the osteoblastic differentiation and proliferation of primary osteoblast-like cells encountered in 2D culture, and (3) therefore reproduces ex vivo the phenotype of human 3D-networked osteocytes. The 3D tissue construction approach is expected to provide a clinically relevant and high-throughput means for evaluating drugs and treatments that target bone diseases with in vitro convenience. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available