4.7 Article

A safe and molecular-tagged Brucella canis ghosts confer protection against virulent challenge in mice

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages 121-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.027

Keywords

Brucella canis; Bacterial ghost; Safety; Immunogenicity; Protective efficacy; Differential diagnosis

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303042]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101840, 31402183]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canine Brucellosis, caused by Brucella canis, is a persistent infectious reproductive disease in dogs. The absence of effective treatment to the intracellular pathogen and the irreversible consequence of infection makes the need of a specific vaccine urgent. Bacterial ghosts (BGs) are the empty envelopes of bacteria with no genome content inside, which emerge as a proper vaccine candidate due to its intact outer antigen. It is generally derived from a genetically engineered strain, through the expression of Bacteriophage phiX174 lysis E gene upon induction. In this study, we combined the homologous recombination (HR) and bacterial ghost technologies, generating a genetically stable B. cools ghost strain which bears no drug resistance gene. When the ghost strain grows to OD600 of 0.6, 100% inactivation can be achieved under 42 degrees C in 60 h. The resultant BGs showed guaranteed safety and comparable immunogenicity to a live vaccine. The bacterial B0419 protein was depleted during HR process, which is subsequently proved to work as a molecular tag in distinguishing natural infection and BGs immunization through ELISA. Additionally, the BGs also conferred protection against B. canis RM6/66 and B. melitensis 16 M. Therefore, the application of current BGs as a vaccine candidate and the corresponding serological diagnostic approach may provide better B. canis prevention strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available