4.7 Article

Turbulent planar wakes under pressure gradient conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 830, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2017.649

Keywords

general fluid mechanics; mathematical foundations; wakes

Funding

  1. EOS (Energie Ouest Suisse)
  2. Swiss Federal Office of Energy [SI/501337-01]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_172538]
  4. Swiss Innovation and Technology Committee (CTI) within Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research 'FURIES: Future Swiss Electrical Infrastructure
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_172538] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate prediction of the spatial evolution of turbulent wake flows under pressure gradient conditions is required in some engineering applications such as the design of high-lift devices and wind farms over topography. In this paper, we aim to develop an analytical model to predict the evolution of a turbulent planar wake under an arbitrary pressure gradient condition. The model is based on the cross-stream integration of the streamwise momentum equation and uses the self-similarity of the mean flow. We have also made an experimentally supported assumption that the ratio of the maximum velocity deficit to the wake width is independent of the imposed pressure gradient. The asymptotic response of the wake to the pressure gradient is also investigated. After its derivation, the model is successfully validated against experimental data by comparing the evolution of the wake width and maximum velocity deficit. The inputs of the model are the imposed pressure gradient and the wake width under zero pressure gradient. The model does not require any parameter tuning and is deemed to be practical, computationally fast, accurate enough, and therefore useful for the scientific and engineering communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available