4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A study on thermal performance of parallel connected pulsating heat pipe

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 1063-1068

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.191

Keywords

Pulsating heat pipe; Parallel connect; Thermal performance; Startup

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MEST) [NRF-201481A2A2A01003618]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A2A2A01003618] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of experiments were performed to investigate thermal performance of single, parallel connected and two turns pulsating heat pipe (PHP) using different working fluids. The copper capillary tube was used which has internal and external diameter 2.2 mm and 3.2 mm respectively. The PHP was filled with ethanol and deionized (DI) as working fluids with filling ratio 50%. Theoretical thermal resistance of parallel connected PHP was obtained using the experimental results of single turn PHP. DI water needs more input power to vaporize and startup than ethanol because boiling temperature and specific heat of DI water are larger than that of ethanol. At low input power, temperature of the PHP filled with DI water was not oscillated which means the device operates as thermosyphon. But temperature of the PHP filled with ethanol fluctuated at low input power which means liquid slug and vapor plug moves inside of the device. Thus, thermal resistance of the PHP filled with ethanol is lower than DI water which means ethanol is preferred as working fluid. Parallel connected pulsating heat pipe shows better thermal performance than two turns one from 42 W to 50 W for both working fluids because the effect of pressure drop is larger than the effect of increased perturbation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available