4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transport and hydrodynamic properties of 3D-structured catalytic supports

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 167-178

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.155

Keywords

Periodic open cellular structures; Structured materials; Effective thermal conductivity; Pressure drop

Funding

  1. Commission of French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA, Liten), France
  2. Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Belgium
  3. VITO, Sustainable Materials Management Department personnel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, heat transport and pressure drop properties of 3D-manufactured stainless steel structured catalytic supports are described based on experimental data and modelling. The effective thermal conductivity was determined at temperatures between 50 and 500 degrees C by diffusivity measurements. For the samples with 74% macroporosity, at temperatures from 50 to 500 degrees C, axial and radial effective thermal conductivities range between 1.78-2.5 and 1.83-2.87 W.m(-1).K-1, respectively. The effect of geometry (fibre stacking, fibre diameter and macro-porosity) on the effective thermal conductivity was experimentally determined and compared to the modelling results. The main parameter influencing the effective thermal conductivity was found to be the macroporosity. The effect of the geometry (fibre stacking) and the coating thickness on the pressure drop were studied experimentally. The pressure drop was measured by a manometer with air as a fluid gas. Pressure drop measurements showed that the samples with zig-zag fibre stacking (1-3 stacking) have higher pressure drop values than the samples with straight fibre stacking (1-1 stacking) at the same macroporosity due to their lower open frontal area. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available