4.7 Article

Mutant CTNNB1 and histological heterogeneity define metabolic subtypes of hepatoblastoma

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1589-1604

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201707814

Keywords

glucose transporter; glycolysis; mutant beta-catenin; pediatric liver cancer

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3_133661, PP00P3_157527]
  2. FORCE, a Foundation for Children Cancer Research
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_157527, PP00P3_133661] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatoblastoma is the most common malignant pediatric liver cancer. Histological evaluation of tumor biopsies is used to distinguish among the different subtypes of hepatoblastoma, with fetal and embryonal representing the two main epithelial components. With frequent CTNNB1 mutations, hepatoblastoma is a Wnt/beta-catenin-driven malignancy. Considering that Wnt activation has been associated with tumor metabolic reprogramming, we characterized the metabolic profile of cells from hepatoblastoma and compared it to cells from hepatocellular carcinoma. First, we demonstrated that glucose transporter GLUT3 is a direct TCF4/beta-catenin target gene. RNA sequencing enabled to identify molecular and metabolic features specific to hepatoblastoma and revealed that several glycolytic enzymes are overexpressed in embryonal-like compared to fetal-like tumor cells. This led us to implement successfully three biomarkers to distinguish embryonal from fetal components by immunohistochemistry from a large panel of human hepatoblastoma samples. Functional analyses demonstrated that embryonal-like hepatoblastoma cells are highly glycolytic and sensitive to hexokinase-1 silencing. Altogether, our findings reveal a new, metabolic classification of human hepatoblastoma, with potential future implications for patients' diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available