4.1 Article

Assessment of endogenous 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum concentrations by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in various animal species

Journal

VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 371-379

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vcp.12476

Keywords

Cholecalciferol; dog; ergocalciferol; mass spectrometry; monkey; rodent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundMass spectrometry (MS) has become the preferential method for the analysis of vitamin D in the clinic, yet no single platform is utilized for preclinical species in drug development studies. For vitamin D, the MS platform can provide certain benefits such as applicability of a single assay for multiple species, low cost, and high specificity. ObjectivesA quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) assay for 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3 (25OHD(3)) and D-2 (25OHD(2)) was validated for rat, dog, mouse, and monkey, and suitability for drug development studies was assessed. MethodsStandards were used to determine intra- and inter-assay accuracy and precision for LC-MS/MS. Extraction recovery and carryover due to instrumentation were determined. Repeat analyses of pooled serum samples from rat, dog, mouse, and monkey were assessed for precision, and other serum samples were used to determine the normal range in each species and detect biologically relevant changes. ResultsFor both 25OHD(3) and 25OHD(2), inaccuracy was 6%, and imprecision was 13%. Extraction recovery was 75% for 25OHD(3) and 72% for 25OHD(2), and carryover was 0.1%. Measurable concentrations of 25OHD(3) were recorded in serum samples from all species tested, but no 25OHD(2) as diets were only fortified with 25OHD(3). This dataset provides preliminary information for the determination of RIs for 25OHD(3) in rat, dog, mouse, and monkey with the LC-MS/MS platform. ConclusionsThe LC-MS/MS assay was accurate and precise for determination of endogenous concentrations of 25OHD(3) in serum samples from drug development studies in rat, dog, mouse, and monkey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available