4.7 Article

TOUGH2-seed: A coupled fluid flow and mechanical-stochastic approach to model injection-induced seismicity

Journal

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 86-97

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.003

Keywords

Induced seismicity; EGS; TOUGH2; Hydro-mechanical-stochastic modeling

Funding

  1. SNSF Ambizione Energy [PZENP2_160555]
  2. Swiss Seismological Service (SED)
  3. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI)
  4. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia - Sezione di Bologna
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZENP2_160555] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the injection-induced triggering mechanism is a fundamental step towards controlling the seismicity generated by deep underground exploitation. Here we propose a modeling approach based on coupling the TOUGH2 simulator with a geomechanical-stochastic model. The hydro-mechanical-stochastic model provides a good representation of different mechanisms influencing each other during and after the injection phase. Each mechanism affects the induced seismicity in a different way and at different times during the reservoir stimulation, confirming that a complex interaction is in place, and that more sophisticated and physics-based approaches coupled with statistical model are required to explain such a complex interaction. In addition to previous statistical and hybrid models, our approach accounts for a full 3D formulation of both stresses and fluid flow, further including all the TOUGH2 capabilities. Furthermore, it includes interactions between triggered seismic events through calculation of static stress transfer. In this work, we present the main capabilities of TOUGH2-SEED and apply the model to the Basel EGS case, successfully reproducing the injection pressure as well as the evolution of the seismicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available