4.5 Article

The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1773-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_14103, MC_PC_15069] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CS-2013-13-012] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_PC_15069, MC_PC_14103] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15069, MC_PC_14103] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Department of Health [CS-2013-13-012] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The serious adverse events associated with metal on metal hip replacements have highlighted the importance of improving methods for monitoring surgical implants. The new European Union (EU) device regulation will enforce post-marketing surveillance based on registries among other surveillance tools. Europe has a common regulatory environment, a common market for medical devices, and extensive experience with joint replacement registries. In this context, we elaborate how joint replacement registries, while building on existing structure and data, can better ensure safety and balance risks and benefits. Main text: Actions to improve registry-based implant surveillance include: enriching baseline and diversifying outcomes data collection; improving methodology to limit bias; speeding-up failure detection by active real-time monitoring; implementing risk-benefit analysis; coordinating collaboration between registries; and translating knowledge gained from the data into clinical decision-making and public health policy. Conclusions: The changes proposed here will improve patient safety, enforce the application of the new legal EU requirements, augment evidence, improve clinical decision-making, facilitate value-based health-care delivery, and provide up-to-date guidance for public health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available