4.1 Article

Evaluation of a women group led health communication program in Haryana, India

Journal

EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 12-19

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.019

Keywords

Health Literacy; Evaluation; Health Education; Behavior Change; Empowerment

Funding

  1. National Rural Health Mission of Haryana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Sakshar Mahila Smooh (SMS) program was launched in rural areas of Haryana in India during 2008. A total of 6788 SMSs, each having 5-10 literate women, were equipped to enhance health communication. We carried out process evaluation of this program as an external agency. Methodology: After a review of program documents, a random sample survey of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), SMS members, and village women was conducted. Out of four divisions of the state, one was randomly chosen, which had five districts. From 330 randomly chosen villages, 283 ANMs, 1164 SMS members, and 1123 village women were interviewed using a semi- structured interview schedule. Program inputs, processes, and outputs were compared in the five districts. Chi square was used for significance test. Results: In the sampled division, out of 2009 villages, 1732 (86%) had functional SMS. In three years, SMS conducted 15036 group meetings, 2795 rallies, 2048 wall writings, and 803 competitions, and 44.5% of allocated budget was utilized. Most ANMs opined that SMSs are better health communicators. SMS members were aware about their roles and responsibilities. Majority of village women reported that SMS carry out useful health education activities. The characteristics of SMS members were similar but program performance was better in districts where health managers were proactive in program planning and monitoring. Conclusions: SMS Program has communicated health messages to majority of rural population, however, better planning & monitoring can improve program performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available