4.5 Article

Preparing for what might happen: An episodic specificity induction impacts the generation of alternative future events

Journal

COGNITION
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 118-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.010

Keywords

Episodic future simulation; Prospection; Episodic specificity induction; Alternative future events; Emotion; Debiasing

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [AG08441]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical adaptive feature of future thinking involves the ability to generate alternative versions of possible future events. However, little is known about the nature of the processes that support this ability. Here we examined whether an episodic specificity induction brief training in recollecting details of a recent experience that selectively impacts tasks that draw on episodic retrieval (1) boosts alternative event generation and (2) changes one's initial perceptions of negative future events. In Experiment 1, an episodic specificity induction significantly increased the number of alternative positive outcomes that participants generated to a series of standardized negative events, compared with a control induction not focused on episodic specificity. We also observed larger decreases in the perceived plausibility and negativity of the original events in the specificity condition, where participants generated more alternative outcomes, relative to the control condition. In Experiment 2, we replicated and extended these findings using a series of personalized negative events. Our findings support the idea that episodic memory processes are involved in generating alternative outcomes to anticipated future events, and that boosting the number of alternative outcomes is related to subsequent changes in the perceived plausibility and valence of the original events, which may have implications for psychological well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available