4.5 Article

Removal of Heavy Metal Ions From Aqueous Solutions Using Bacillus subtilis Biomass Pre-Treated by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Journal

CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201700356

Keywords

Autoclaving; Biosorption; Gram-positive bacteria; Heavy metals; SC-CO2

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia [1453, 203/PTEKIND/6711328]
  2. ISGP Grant [U682]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface properties of bacterial cells enable them to be used in the removal of heavy metals. Moreover, the inactivation of bacterial cells via chemical or physical processes may enhance the biosorption efficiency for heavy metals. The use of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) to inactivate bacteria based on destruction of cell walls took place due to the pressurized CO2. In this study, the pre-treatment of Bacillus subtilis cells by SC-CO2 (BM1), steam autoclaving (BM2), and untreated living cells (BM3) were investigated to show improvement in heavy metal removal. The removal process was optimized based on the main factors affecting bacterial biosorption, which included heavy metals ion concentrations, cell biomass concentrations, pH, time, and temperature. The efficiency of bacterial biomass in removing Ni2+ ions in the presence of different concentrations of Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ was also tested. BM1 and BM2 exhibited the highest potential for the removal of nickel ions in comparison to BM3. The maximum efficiency was 98.54, 99.2, and 96.3% for BM1, BM2, and BM3, respectively. Moreover, BM1 displayed a higher biosorption capacity for Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cd2+ (>150 mg g(-1)) than BM2 and BM3. Biosorption on bacterial cell biomass of Ni2+ ions shows lower removal affinity in the presence of other metal ions. In conclusion, the pre-treatment of bacterial cells biomass by SC-CO2 enhanced the removal process of heavy metal ions compared to untreated living cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available