4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

β-Ga2O3 solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetector based on annealed sapphire substrate

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 106-110

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.07.039

Keywords

Vaccum annealing; Sapphire substrate; beta-Ga2O3; Solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetector; Molecular beam epitaxy

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61223002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A vacuum annealing was conducted on c-plane sapphire substrate in a plasma-assisted MBE system prior to the epitaxial growth of beta-Ga2O3 film. Accordingly, both the crystal structures of epitaxial films and the device performance of fabricated metal-semiconductor-metal photodetectors were comparatively investigated based on the as-supplied and annealed sapphire substrates. The AFM result showed a large number of protrusions distributed uniformly on the surface of annealed sapphire substrate, proving an effective high-temperature reconstruction by such a pretreatment. Moreover, the beta-Ga2O3 epitaxial film exhibited a significantly improved crystalline quality by adopting the annealed sapphire substrate as revealed by the XRD measurement. Accordingly, the carrier mobility could be improved due to the suppression of impurity scattering related to structural disorders, resulting in the observed significant increase of both dark and photo currents in photodetector. As a result, its DUV responsibility was improved from 44 A/W to 153 A/W. However, some degradations in photo-to-dark current ratio and response time appeared, which can be attributed to the reduction in the crystallographic defects impacting internal gain and carrier recombination, respectively. This work may pave an alternative way for the fabrication of high-performance beta-Ga2O3 solar-blind DUV photodetector, especially for high responsibility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available