4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Albero: A Visual Analytics Approach for Probabilistic Weather Forecasting

Journal

COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 135-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13279

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG in Priority Research Programme Volunteered Geographic Information: Interpretation, Visualisation and Social Computing [SPP 1894]
  2. MetaVis project - Research Council of Norway [250133]
  3. PICT - MinCyT, Argentina [2014-1000]
  4. BMVIT
  5. BMWFW
  6. Styria
  7. SFG
  8. Vienna Business Agency in the scope of COMET - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies [854174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probabilistic weather forecasts are amongst the most popular ways to quantify numerical forecast uncertainties. The analog regression method can quantify uncertainties and express them as probabilities. The method comprises the analysis of errors from a large database of past forecasts generated with a specific numerical model and observational data. Current visualization tools based on this method are essentially automated and provide limited analysis capabilities. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that breaks down the automatic process using the experience and knowledge of the users and creates a new interactive visual workflow. Our approach allows forecasters to study probabilistic forecasts, their inner analogs and observations, their associated spatial errors, and additional statistical information by means of coordinated and linked views. We designed the presented solution following a participatory methodology together with domain experts. Several meteorologists with different backgrounds validated the approach. Two case studies illustrate the capabilities of our solution. It successfully facilitates the analysis of uncertainty and systematic model biases for improved decision-making and process-quality measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available