4.5 Article

Development of novel replication-defective lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus vectors expressing SIV antigens

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.063

Keywords

LCMV; SIV; NHP

Funding

  1. NIH [AI007245, AI07387, AI078526, AI096040]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1033091]
  3. Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard
  4. Herchel Smith Graduate Fellowship
  5. Hookipa Biotech
  6. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (Die Osterreichische Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft, FFG)
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1033091] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important focus in vaccine research is the design of vaccine vectors with low seroprevalence and high immunogenicity. Replication-incompetent lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (rLCMV) vectors do not elicit vector-neutralizing antibody responses, and homologous prime-boost regimens with rLCMV vectors induce boostable and protective T cell responses to model antigens in mice. However, cellular and humoral immune responses following homologous rLCMV vaccine regimens have not been rigorously evaluated in non-human primates (NHPs). To test whether rLCMV vectors constitute an effective vaccine platform in NHPs, we developed rLCMV vectors expressing SIVmac239 Env and Gag antigens and assessed their immunogenicity in mice and cynomolgus macaques. Immunization with rLCMV vaccine vectors expressing SIV Env and Gag was effective at generating Sly-specific T cell and antibody responses in both mice and NHPs. Epitope mapping using SIN/ Env in C57BL/6 mice demonstrated that rLCMV vectors induced sustained poly-functional responses to both dominant and subdominant epitopes. Our results suggest the potential of rLCMV vectors as vaccine candidates. Future SIV challenge experiments in rhesus macaques will be needed to assess immune protection by these vaccine vectors. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available