4.5 Article

A prospective, placebo controlled study on the humoral immune response to and safety of tetanus revaccination in myasthenia gravis

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 35, Issue 46, Pages 6290-6296

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.078

Keywords

Tetanus; Vaccination; Autoimmune disease; Myasthenia gravis; Immunosuppression; Antibodies

Funding

  1. project Myasterix [602420]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the humoral immune response to and safety of a tetanus revaccination in patients with myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Methods: A tetanus revaccination was administered to 66 patients. Before and 4 weeks after revaccination a blood sample and clinical outcome scores were obtained. Anti-tetanus IgG total, IgG1 and IgG4 titres were measured with an ELISA and disease-specific antibody titres (AChR, MuSK or VGCC) with a radio-immunoprecipitation assay. A historic healthy control group was used for comparing tetanus antibody titres with that of our patients. A placebo (saline) vaccination group was used to investigate the variability of clinical outcome scores with a 4 weeks interval. Results: In 60 of 65 patients, a significant increase of the anti-tetanus antibody response was measured. Thymectomy did not have an impact on this responsiveness. Patients with immunosuppressive medication had a significantly lower pre and post titre compared to healthy controls, but their response was still significant. The titres of disease-specific antibodies were unchanged 4 weeks after revaccination. The clinical outcome scores showed no exacerbation of symptoms of the disease. Conclusion: A tetanus revaccination in patients with myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome is safe and induces a significant immune response, irrespectively of their immunosuppressive medication. We observed neither immunological nor clinical relevant exacerbations associated with the tetanus revaccination. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available