4.6 Article

Motor correlates of phantom limb pain

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 29-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.015

Keywords

Amputees; Body representation; Neuroimaging; Phantom limb pain; Plasticity

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Merton College, Oxford
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. London Pain Consortium
  5. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research centre
  6. Royal Society [104128/Z/14/Z]
  7. Wellcome Trust [104128/Z/14/Z]
  8. Medical Research Council [G0700399, 1379433] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Wellcome Trust [104128/A/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0700399] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following amputation, individuals ubiquitously report experiencing lingering sensations of their missing limb. While phantom sensations can be innocuous, they are often manifested as painful. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is notorious for being difficult to monitor and treat. A major challenge in PLP management is the difficulty in assessing PLP symptoms, given the physical absence of the affected body part. Here, we offer a means of quantifying chronic PLP by harnessing the known ability of amputees to voluntarily move their phantom limbs. Upper-limb amputees suffering from chronic PLP performed a simple finger-tapping task with their phantom hand. We confirm that amputees suffering from worse chronic PLP had worse motor control over their phantom hand. We further demonstrate that task performance was consistent over weeks and did not relate to transient PLP or non-painful phantom sensations. Finally, we explore the neural basis of these behavioural correlates of PLP. Using neuroimaging, we reveal that slower phantom hand movements were coupled with stronger activity in the primary sensorimotor phantom hand cortex, previously shown to associate with chronic PLP. By demonstrating a specific link between phantom hand motor control and chronic PLP, our findings open up new avenues for PLP management and improvement of existing PLP treatments. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available