4.5 Article

A numerical study on heat transfer enhancement and design of a heat exchanger with porous media in continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis system

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1352-1359

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.01.015

Keywords

Continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis; Heat exchanger; Heat transfer enhancement; Porous media; Numerical simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to use a new configuration of porous media in a heat exchanger in continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis (CHFS) system to enhance the heat transfer andminimize the required length of the heat exchanger. For this purpose, numerous numerical simulations are performed to investigate performance of the system with porous media. First, the numerical simulation for the heat exchanger in CHFS system is validated by experimental data. Then, porous media is added to the system and six different thicknesses for the porous media are examined to obtain the optimum thickness, based on the minimum required length of the heat exchanger. Finally, by changing the flow rate and inlet temperature of the product as well as the cooling water flow rate, the minimum required length of the heat exchanger with porous media for various inlet conditions is assessed. The investigations indicate that using porous media with the proper thickness in the heat exchanger increases the cooling rate of the product by almost 40% and reduces the required length of the heat exchanger by approximately 35%. The results also illustrate that the most proper thickness of the porous media is approximately equal to 90% of the product tube's thickness. Results of this study lead to design a porous heat exchanger in CHFS system for various inlet conditions. (C) 2017 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available