4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Investigation Investigation on different chemical stability of mitochondrial Hsp60 and its precursor

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages 31-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2017.07.008

Keywords

SAXS; CD; Guanidinium chloride; Unfolding; Hsp60; Stibility-function relationship

Funding

  1. Italian MIUR within the FIRB Futuro in Ricerca Program [RBFR12SIPT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the large class of molecules that maintain protein homeostasis, called molecular chaperones, chaperonins constitute a subclass that specifically assist the correct folding of newly synthesized proteins. Among them, Hsp60 is composed of a double heptameric ring structure with a large central cavity where the unfolded protein binds via hydrophobic interactions and is supported, in this function, by the co-chaperonin Hsp10. Hsp60 is typically located in the mitochondria, but in some pathological situations, such as cancers and chronic inflammatory diseases, Hsp60 accumulates in the cytoplasm. In these cases, cytoplasmatic Hsp60 is a mixture of mitochondrial Hsp60 secreted from mitochondria upon stress, and its precursor, called na ve Hsp60, never entered into the organella. The difference between the na ve and mitochondrial Hsp6Os resides in the absence of the mitochondrial import signal (MIS) in the mitochondrial form, but information on their different structure and stability is still lacking. We present here a study on the stability against a chemical denaturant, of the different cytoplasmic Hsp60 species. By combining Circular Dichroism and Small Angle X-ray Scattering as experimental biophysical techniques to investigate Hsp60, we find that na ve and mitochondrial Hsp60 (mtHsp60) forms differ in their stability. Furthermore, specific responses from the two forms are discussed in terms of the biological environment they are working in, thus opening new questions on their biological function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available