4.4 Article

Discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and parent-child agreement on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in treatment- and non-treatment-seeking youth

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 22-31

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.006

Keywords

Anxiety; Children; Adolescents; Psychometrics Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED)

Funding

  1. National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders (NARSAD)
  2. Richard J. Wyatt Memorial Fellowship Award for Translational Research
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [ZIA MH002781]
  4. NIMH [R01MH069942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Emotional Disorder (SCARED) may be differentially sensitive to detecting specific or comorbid anxiety diagnoses in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking youth. We assessed the SCARED's discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and informant agreement using parent- and self-report from healthy and treatment-seelcing anxious youth (Study 1, N = 585) and from non-treatment-seeking anxious youth (Study 2, N = 331) diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), or comorbid GAD + SAD. Among treatment-seeking youth, the SCARED showed good diagnostic utility and specificity, differentiating healthy, comorbid, and non-comorbid anxious youth. Child-parent agreement was modest: healthy child self-reports were higher than parent-reports whereas anxious child self-reports were similar or lower than parent-reports. Less consistent results emerged for diagnostic utility, specificity, and informant agreement among non-treatment-seeking youth. Given the number of non-treatment seeking anxious youth (N = 33), generalizability of these findings may be limited. Together, results suggest informants may provide distinct information about children's anxiety symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available