4.6 Article

Lessons Learned From Past Gene-Environment Interaction Successes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 7, Pages 778-786

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx230

Keywords

exposure; gene-environment; genome-wide association studies; interactions; metabolism genes; pathway genes; pharmacogenomics

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P30ES07048, R21ES024844, R01ES023834, R21ES024834, RO1ES10544]
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P01CA196569, R01CA201407, UH2CA191284]
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NCI Intramural Research Program funds)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic and environmental factors are both known to contribute to susceptibility to complex diseases. Therefore, the study of gene-environment interaction (GxE) has been a focus of research for several years. In this article, select examples of GxE from the literature are described to highlight different approaches and underlying principles related to the success of these studies. These examples can be broadly categorized as studies of single metabolism genes, genes in complex metabolism pathways, ranges of exposure levels, functional approaches and model systems, and pharmacogenomics. Some studies illustrated the success of studying exposure metabolism for which candidate genes can be identified. Moreover, some GxE successes depended on the availability of high-quality exposure assessment and longitudinal measures, study populations with a wide range of exposure levels, and the inclusion of ethnically and geographically diverse populations. In several examples, large population sizes were required to detect GxEs. Other examples illustrated the impact of accurately defining scale of the interactions (i.e., additive or multiplicative). Last, model systems and functional approaches provided insights into GxE in several examples. Future studies may benefit from these lessons learned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available