4.6 Article

Building upon the Koutecky-Levich Equation for Evaluation of Next-Generation Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages 99-108

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.145

Keywords

Koutecky-Levich equation; rotating disk electrode; oxygen reduction reaction; mass transport; reaction order

Funding

  1. Volkswagen Group of America
  2. Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts has been substantially improved over the past several decades. These catalysts are evaluated for electrochemical activity in a rotating disk electrode (RDE) assembly using an oxygen saturated liquid electrolyte. Koutecky-Levich (K-L) analysis provides a simple and effective method to extract electrokinetic information by correcting for mass transport effects. We propose extensions to the K-L analysis to address some of the simplifying assumptions made during its derivation. In particular, we demonstrate that decreased concentrations of surface reactants contribute to measured overpotentials in a Nernst fashion, and can lead to an underestimation of catalytic activity. By applying a Nernst overpotential correction in conjunction with K-L analysis, more accurate measurements of the intrinsic reaction kinetics under mass transport limited conditions are possible. As the K-L method assumes a reaction order of unity, we also consider kinetic reaction order deviation from unity due to measurement conditions. We show that examining the dependence of the reaction order on overpotential can provide a straightforward technique to probe blocking effects of surface absorbents. We propose that these extensions to the K-L method can allow for increased versatility of the RDE technique for extracting electrokinetic parameters for ORR catalysts. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available