4.8 Review

Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue 22, Pages 6855-6871

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00149e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon Research and Innovation Programme [660306]
  2. German Federal Ministry for Transportation and Digital Infrastructure
  3. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [02WRS1378, 01UU1603]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [660306] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future plastic materials will be very different from those that are used today. The increasing importance of sustainability promotes the development of bio-based and biodegradable polymers, sometimes misleadingly referred to as 'bioplastics'. Because both terms imply green'' sources and clean'' removal, this paper aims at critically discussing the sometimes-conflicting terminology as well as renewable sources with a special focus on the degradation of these polymers in natural environments. With regard to the former we review innovations in feedstock development (e.g. microalgae and food wastes). In terms of the latter, we highlight the effects that polymer structure, additives, and environmental variables have on plastic biodegradability. We argue that the 'biodegradable' end-product does not necessarily degrade once emitted to the environment because chemical additives used to make them fit for purpose will increase the longevity. In the future, this trend may continue as the plastics industry also is expected to be a major user of nanocomposites. Overall, there is a need to assess the performance of polymer innovations in terms of their biodegradability especially under realistic waste management and environmental conditions, to avoid the unwanted release of plastic degradation products in receiving environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available