4.7 Article

An evolutionary algorithm with directed weights for constrained multi-objective optimization

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 613-622

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.053

Keywords

Constraint-handling technique; Constrained multi-objective optimization; Decomposition; Evolutionary algorithm

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673121]
  2. Projects of Science and Technology of Guangzhou [201508010008]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs), keeping infeasible individuals with good objective values and small constraint violations in the population can improve the performance of the algorithms, since they provide the information about the optimal direction towards Pareto front. By taking the constraint violation as an objective, we propose a novel constraint-handling technique based on directed weights to deal with CMOPs. This paper adopts two types of weights, i.e. feasible and infeasible weights distributing on feasible and infeasible regions respectively, to guide the search to the promising region. To utilize the useful information contained in infeasible individuals, this paper uses infeasible weights to maintain a number of well-diversified infeasible individuals. Meanwhile, they are dynamically changed along with the evolution to prefer infeasible individuals with better objective values and smaller constraint violations. Furthermore, 18 test instances and 2 engineering design problems are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Several numerical experiments indicate that the proposed algorithm outperforms four compared algorithms in terms of finding a set of well-distributed non-domination solutions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available