4.8 Review

Soft tissue fillers for adipose tissue regeneration: From hydrogel development toward clinical applications

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 37-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.026

Keywords

Adipose tissue regeneration; Lipofilling; Hydrogels; Injectable; 3D scaffolds

Funding

  1. FWO [G008413N, G044516N]
  2. BELSPO IAP Photonics@be
  3. Methusalem foundation
  4. Hercules foundation
  5. Flanders Make
  6. OZR of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
  7. Ghent University
  8. Special Research Fund
  9. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a clear and urgent clinical need to develop soft tissue fillers that outperform the materials currently used for adipose tissue reconstruction. Recently, extensive research has been performed within this field of adipose tissue engineering as the commercially available products and the currently existing techniques are concomitant with several disadvantages. Commercial products are highly expensive and associated with an imposing need for repeated injections. Lipofilling or free fat transfer has an unpredictable outcome with respect to cell survival and potential resorption of the fat grafts. Therefore, researchers are predominantly investigating two challenging adipose tissue engineering strategies: in situ injectable materials and porous 3D printed scaffolds. The present work provides an overview of current research encompassing synthetic, biopolymer-based and extracellular matrix-derived materials with a clear focus on emerging fabrication technologies and developments realized throughout the last decade. Moreover, clinical relevance of the most promising materials will be discussed, together with potential concerns associated with their application in the clinic. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available