4.3 Article

Incidence, indications and predicting factors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A retrospective study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages 508-516

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.03.004

Keywords

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Aortic stenosis; Permanent pacemaker implantation; Predicting factors; Incidence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. - As the number of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures is constantly increasing, it is important to consider common complications, such as pacemaker (PM) implantation, and their specific risk factors. Aims. - Echocardiographic, computed tomography and electrocardiographic data were analysed to determine the predicting factors, if any, associated with PM implantation. Methods.- This retrospective study included patients referred to Nancy University Hospital for a TAVI procedure from January 2013 to December 2015. Both Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards SAPIEN valves were implanted. Patients with preprocedurally implanted PMs and/or referred from another institution were excluded. Results. - Of 208 TAVI patients, 23 had a pre-existing PM and were excluded. A new PM was required in 38 patients (20.5%). Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB), the use of the Medtronic CoreValve and large prostheses were identified as predictors of PM implantation (P=0.0361, P=0.0004 and P=0.0019,respectively). Using logistic regression, predictors of PM implantation included first-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.1; P=0.0054) and large aortic annulus diameter in echocardiography (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1-1.4; P=0.0447), with a threshold of 24.1 mm. For the combination of preTAVI PR duration > 220 ms and QRS duration > 120 ms, the positive predictive value for PM implantation reached 80%. Conclusion. - Use of the Medtronic CoreValve, RBBB and first-degree atrioventricular block are major risk factors for post-TAVI PM implantation. In addition, large aortic annulus and large valvular prosthesis are independent risk factors for PM implantation. The combination of preTAVI prolonged PR interval and increased QRS duration could be used as a marker for periprocedural PM implantation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available