4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Intake of DDT and its metabolites through food items among reproductive age women in Bangladesh

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 744-751

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.041

Keywords

POPs; DDT; Bangladesh; Food; House dust; Breast milk

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18780245, MK16H05254, MK224006022]
  2. Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho) Scholarship [142220]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18780245] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to make clear the major intake route of DDT in Bangladesh people to develop strategy and policy that could lead to a reduction in body burden especially in the reproductive age women. The concentrations of several POPs (DDT, PCBs, chlordanes, HCHs, HCB, and PeCB) were quantified in food items, human breast milk and house dust collected in Bangladesh in 2011-2012. Among the POPs analyzed in this study, DDT and its metabolites (Sigma DDT) showed the highest concentration. The highest median Sigma DDT concentration was found in meat (1.3-1100 ng g(-1) wet weight) and house dust (30 -1100 ng g(-1) dry weight), and followed by human breast milk (20-55 ng g(-1) wet weight). Estimated daily intake (EDI) was calculated using the DDT concentrations in food items. The highest intake of DDT was found in an infant and 99% of it was via breast milk feeding: DDT intake via consumption of beef accounted for 69% and 72% of that found in children and adults, respectively. The total EDI of DDT did not exceed the tolerable daily intake proposed by the WHO, but the EDI of p,p'-DDT exceeded the oral reference dose proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Further research is required to clarify the reason for the high levels of DDT in beef, which seems to be the major intake route of DDT for women of reproductive age in Bangladesh. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available