4.5 Article

Development of the Hand Assessment for Infants: evidence of internal scale validity

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 12, Pages 1276-1283

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13585

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. La Fondation Motrice - Sodiaal (Paris, France)
  2. Health Care Sciences Postgraduate School
  3. Strategic Research Programme in Care Sciences at Karolinska Institutet, Stiftelsen Frimurare Barnhuset Stockholm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM The aim of this study was to develop a descriptive and evaluative assessment of upper limb function for infants aged 3 to 12 months and to investigate its internal scale validity for use with infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy. METHOD The concepts of the test items and scoring criteria were developed. Internal scale validity and aspects of reliability were investigated on the basis of 156 assessments of infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age (mean 7.2mo, SD 2.5) with signs of asymmetric hand use. Rasch measurement model analysis and non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS The new test, the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), consists of 12 unimanual and five bimanual items, each scored on a 3-point rating scale. It demonstrated a unidimensional construct and good fit to the Rasch model requirements. The excellent person reliability enabled person separation to six significant ability strata. The HAI produced an interval-level measure of bilateral hand use as well as unimanual scores of each hand, allowing a quantification of possible asymmetry expressed as an asymmetry index. INTERPRETATION The HAI can be considered a valid assessment tool for measuring bilateral hand use and quantifying side difference between hands among infants at risk of developing unilateral cerebral palsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available