4.5 Article

High diagnostic yield of clinically unidentifiable syndromic growth disorders by targeted exome sequencing

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 594-605

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13038

Keywords

next-generation sequencing; overgrowth; short stature; syndrome

Funding

  1. Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology [30-2015-022]
  2. Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAs syndromic short stature and overgrowth are heterogeneous and the list of causative genes is rapidly expanding, there is an unmet need for identifying genetic causes based on conventional gene testing or karyotyping. Early diagnosis leads to the proper management of the patient and providing genetic counseling for family members at risk in a timely manner. Materials and MethodsWe conducted targeted exome sequencing to identify the genetic causes of undiagnosed syndromic short stature or overgrowth in 15 pediatric patients from 13 families in Korea. We applied targeted exome sequencing using the Next Seq platform and a TruSight One panel. ResultsAmong the 13 families, 6 different disorders in 8 patients with short stature or overgrowth were identified, and the diagnostic yield was 46.2%. One boy with overgrowth had a TGFB3 gene mutation. In the short stature group, Coffin-Lowry syndrome (CLS), trichorhinophalangeal syndrome, DYRK1A haploinsufficiency syndrome, short stature with optic atrophy and Pelger-Huet anomaly syndrome with recurrent hepatitis, and type 4 Meier-Gorlin syndrome were identified. One CLS patient had a co-existing monogenic disease, congenital glaucoma, caused by the compound heterozygote mutations of the CYP1B1 gene. ConclusionTargeted exome sequencing is a powerful method for diagnosing syndromic growth disorders. It enables us to understand molecular pathophysiology and investigate new treatments for growth disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available