4.7 Article

Low intensity-ultrasonic irradiation for highly efficient, eco-friendly and fast synthesis of graphene oxide

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 693-703

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.08.010

Keywords

Bath ultrasound; Facile synthesis; Graphene oxide; Nano layer; Hydrophilic group

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2013R1A2A2A03013138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High quality graphene oxide (GO) with low layer number (less than five layers) and large inter-layer space was produced via a new and efficient method using environmentally friendly, fast and economic ultrasonic radiation. The ultrasonic method neither generated any toxic gas nor required any NaNO3, which have been the main drawbacks of the Hummers methods. The major obstacles of the recently reported improved Hummers method for GO synthesis, such as high reaction temperature (50 degrees C) and long reaction time (12 h), were successfully solved using a low intensity-ultrasonic bath for 45 min at 30 degrees C, which significantly reduced the reaction time and energy consumption for GO synthesis. Furthermore, ultrasonic GO exhibited higher surface area, higher crystallinity and higher oxidation efficiency with many hydrophilic groups, fewer sheets with higher spaces between them, a higher sp(3)/sp(2) ratio, and more uniform size distribution than classically prepared GO. Therefore, the new ultrasonic method could be applicable for the sustainable and large-scale production of GO. The production yield of the ultrasonic-assisted GO was 1.25-fold greater than the GO synthesized with the improved Hummers method. Furthermore, the required production cost based on total energy consumption for ultrasonic GO was only 6.5% of that for classical GO. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available