4.8 Article

Effect of Nitrogen Doping Level on the Performance of N-Doped Carbon Quantum Dot/TiO2 Composites for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages 4650-4656

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201700943

Keywords

charge transfer; doping; hydrogen evolution; photocatalysis; quantum dots

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014CB239402, 2013CB834505]
  2. National Key Projects for Fundamental Research and Development of China [2016YFB0600900, 2017YFA0206904, 2017YFA0206900]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1662118, 51572270, 21401207]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17030300]
  5. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2152033]
  6. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have attracted widespread interest for photocatalytic applications, owing to their low cost and excellent electron donor/acceptor properties. However, their advancement as visible-light photosensitizers in CQDs/semiconductor nanocomposites is currently impaired by their poor quantum yields (QYs). Herein, we describe the successful fabrication of a series of nitrogen-doped CQDs (NCDs) with N/C atomic ratios ranging from 0.14-0.30. NCDs with the highest N-doping level afforded a remarkable external QY of 66.8% at 360 nm, and outstanding electron transfer properties and photosensitization efficiencies when physically adsorbed on P25 TiO2. A NCDs/P25-TiO2 hybrid demonstrated excellent performance for hydrogen evolution in aqueous methanol under both UV and visible-light illumination relative to pristine P25 TiO2. Controlled nitrogen doping of CQDs therefore represents a very effective strategy for optimizing the performance of CQDs/semiconductor hybrid photocatalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available