4.7 Article

Development of amplicon deep sequencing markers and data analysis pipeline for genotyping multi-clonal malaria infections

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4260-y

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum; Malaria; Amplicon sequencing; SNP; Haplotype clustering; Multi-clone infections; msp2; csp; cpmp; HaplotypR software

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_159580]
  2. International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research [U19 AI089686]
  3. Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_159580] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Amplicon deep sequencing permits sensitive detection of minority clones and improves discriminatory power for genotyping multi-clone Plasmodium falciparum infections. New amplicon sequencing and data analysis protocols are needed for genotyping in epidemiological studies and drug efficacy trials of P. falciparum. Methods: Targeted sequencing of molecular marker csp and novel marker cpmp was conducted in duplicate on mixtures of parasite culture strains and 37 field samples. A protocol allowing to multiplex up to 384 samples in a single sequencing run was applied. Software HaplotypR was developed for data analysis. Results: Cpmp was highly diverse (H-e = 0.96) in contrast to csp (H-e = 0.57). Minority clones were robustly detected if their frequency was > 1%. False haplotype calls owing to sequencing errors were observed below that threshold. Conclusions: To reliably detect haplotypes at very low frequencies, experiments are best performed in duplicate and should aim for coverage of > 10'000 reads/amplicon. When compared to length polymorphic marker msp2, highly multiplexed amplicon sequencing displayed greater sensitivity in detecting minority clones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available