4.7 Article

Triaxial compressive strength experiment study of recycled aggregate concrete after high temperatures

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 542-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.101

Keywords

Recycled aggregate concrete; Experiment study; High temperatures; Triaxial compressive strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51468003]
  2. Doctoral program of Southwestern University [SWU116071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study the triaxial compressive properties of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) after high temperature, 100 Phi 100 mm x 200 mm cylindrical RAC specimens with different replacement rate (0%, 30%, 70%, 100%) were fabricated to the conventional triaxial experiment (with the lateral confining stress of 0 MPa, 5 MPa, 10 MPa, 15 MPa and 20 MPa) after exposure to different high temperatures (20 degrees C, 200 degrees C, 300 degrees C, 400 degrees C, 500 degrees C). The results show that the specimens present longitudinal splitting failure form when under uniaxial stress condition and inclined plane shear or flake splitting failure form when under triaxial stress condition. The triaxial compressive strength presents the trend of decreasing increasing decreasing with the increase of replacement rate. Improving lateral confining stress can effectively improve the compressive strength of RAC. The triaxial strength of specimens is almost equal to each other when the temperatures do not exceed 400 degrees C. After 500 degrees C high temperature, the triaxial strength will gradually decrease, but the decrease amplitude is far less than that of uniaxial strength. Based on test data and some related theories, the triaxial strength calculation formula of RAC with different replacement rate after high temperatures was given. And it can provide some references for the related research and practical engineering application of RAC. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available